Besides the raging
battles in Shakargarh and Chamb, two other sectors in Punjab
saw fierce exchanges resulting in minor, but potentially useful gains by
Pakistan Army’s IV Corps. Both in Sulaimanki and Hussainiwala Sectors, land
operations were overlaid by negligible, and largely inconsequential, air
support.
Sulaimanki Sector
The precarious
proximity of Sulaimanki Headworks to the international border dictated that Pakistan
Army take offensive action at the outset, so as to pre-empt any Indian designs
against the vital Southern Punjab waterworks. For Pakistan , any territorial gain
would not only threaten nearby Fazilka, it could also provide a firm supporting
base for the impending main offensive as it swung due north-eastwards into the
Indian heartland.
The Pakistani 105 Independent Infantry Brigade (IV Corps) was pitted against Indian 67 Infantry Brigade (‘Foxtrot’ Sector[1]). On the twilight of 3 December, the Pakistani brigade, under cover of intense artillery fire, charged through the Indian troops with such speed and ferocity, that it was able to establish a foothold on the tank obstacle line of Sabuna Distributory six miles inside, within an hour. The Indian troops struck by total ‘pandemonium and bewilderment,’[2] had destroyed all but one of the 22 bridges on the distributory while withdrawing; this desperate action also foreclosed any chances of success of a subsequent counter-attack. The Indians counter-attacked five times over the subsequent nights,[3] but each operation resulted in complete failure, mainly due to intense and accurate artillery shelling by 105 Brigade. Such was the intensity of the artillery fusillade, that the enemy granted undue strength to the attacking troops by imagining two attacking brigades. It was, thus, unable to plan properly and counter-attack confidently, much to the chagrin of the Maj Gen Ram Singh, Commander Foxtrot Sector who thought that 67 Brigade was ‘discomposed and flustered, its men demoralised and put out.’[4] The brigade saw two of its successively changed commanders ram their heads,[5] as it were, against the dogged resistance by Brig Amir Hamza’s brilliantly-led outfit.
Since all Indian counter-attacks
were foiled within hours of darkness, air support during day time largely served
to mop up any stragglers, besides boosting own troops’ morale. No 17 Squadron based at Rafiqui flew 55 F-86E
sorties, of which 33 were considered successful. In 22 sorties, either no
targets could be found or, bombs were released on dead reckoning with
questionable results. Half a dozen tanks and some vehicles were claimed as
destroyed.
Hussainiwala Sector
Several enclaves
nestled in the meandering loops of Rivers Ravi and Sutlej
came to be exchanged during minor operations by either side. Difficult to defend across rivers, one such
Indian enclave was Hussainiwala, which housed important canal headworks by the same name. The
psychologically significant Indian town of Firozpur
lay a tantalising six miles from Hussainiwala.
At twilight of 3 December, Pakistani 106
Infantry Brigade (11 Division) attacked with two infantry battalions and a
troop of armour. The opening barrage of
artillery fire completely surprised the Indian 15 Punjab (35 Brigade), a reinforced two-battalion strength unit tasked
to defend the enclave. Consternation amongst the defenders knew no bounds when
the Hussainiwala Bridge , which had been wired up by them for
demolition, just in case, purportedly blew up under Pakistani artillery fire. The
Officer Commanding of 15 Punjab , safely
ensconced in his headquarters south of River Sutlej, was too overcome by the devastating
situation and pleaded with his superiors for a withdrawal. ‘Infected by his
pessimism’ (as the Indian official historian puts it), the Brigade Commander
was able to convince Commander 7 Division to pull back to the south bank of the
river after having conceded about 20 square miles to Pakistani forces. Within
24 hours of start of the operation, Hussainiwala lay at the mercy of Brig
Mumtaz Khan’s unstoppable brigade.
With the grave threat to the
headworks having developed in no time, IAF responded swiftly, and in full force,
to keep 106 Brigade from making any further headway. Without low level radar
cover, PAF’s presence in the air meant little, and IAF fighters had virtual
freedom of action which they used to some advantage. It is easy to see why any
advance towards Firozpur would have been disastrous. As in Chamb Sector, GHQ
wisely decided not to expand the operation, since the basic objective of
improving the defensive posture had been achieved.
With the Indian ground troops having
hunkered down, PAF fighters on air support missions were unable to spot any
worthwhile targets. A nominal 29 sorties were flown on the following days, and
other than a mission claiming to have targeted an ammunition dump, all others were
unsuccessful.
While 106 Brigade was successful in
capturing the Hussainiwala enclave, the Indians were able to clear the
protrusion known as Sehjra Bulge, as well as an enclave near Mamdot, without
much opposition. Battles involving these latter two enclaves did not entail any
air support.
Scouting the Troops
PAF had three
Mirage IIIRs which were equipped with five OMERA Type 31 optical cameras each,
all mounted in the nose. With a Doppler
navigation radar available, getting to a destination was fairly easy. Magnesium flares provided enough illumination
at night to confer a round-the-clock tactical reconnaissance capability. The number of aircraft was, however, on the
low side and did not sufficiently cater for unserviceabilities.
A month prior to the outbreak of all-out war, PAF had started to fly
cross-border photo recce sorties, some of which were in the vital Chamb Sector,
where Pak Army’s 23
Division had planned a secondary ‘diversionary’ offensive. With the disposition of forces well-known,
the attack resulted in significant advances that threatened India ’s
overland links to Kashmir . It also deprived Indian forces from
establishing a launch pad for offensive operations, towards the vital lines of
communication passing through nearby Gujrat.
Early in the war, another important breakthrough
came in the Sulaimanki-Fazilka Sector, where 105 Independent Infantry Brigade
(IV Corps) was able to surprise the Indian ‘Foxtrot’ Force, and made a firm
foothold in the area of Pak II Corps’ planned main offensive. While the Indian forces desperately carried
out repeated counter attacks, PAF Mirages conducted regular photo recce
missions in Firozpur area to update the ground commanders about Indian
reinforcement efforts aimed at vacating the incursion. In the event, a badly demoralised and
confused Foxtrot Force could not make any headway, and the Pakistani brigade
was able to safeguard the vital Sulaimanki Headworks which was only a mile from
the border.
In preparation for the main offensive, PAF Mirages fervently conducted photo recce missions along the railway networks Firozpur-Kot Kapura, Firozpur-Fazilka and Fazilka-Muktasar, as well as in general areas of Firozpur and Sri Ganganagar, for the latest disposition of forces. An important mission involved recce of crossing points over
Red Patrols
An important,
though abortive effort, involved the move of 1 Armoured Division from its concentration
area in Arifwala-Okara to its forward assembly area east of Bahawalnagar. This
vulnerable move by rail and road was provided with top cover by standing
patrols between 15-17 December. The aptly named ‘red’ CAPs lasted a duration of
30 daylight hours, and involved F-86E, F-6 and Mirage aircraft from Rafiqui,
Sargodha and Risalewala. Given the paucity of resources, this was a commendable
effort indeed. Its efficacy stood out in relief as no enemy aircraft were able
to interfere during any of the 81 sorties flown. In all likelihood, the move
completely eluded the enemy due to bad intelligence. Intriguingly, the unusual
and intense air activity also failed to ring alarm bells, and the IAF missed an
opportunity to undertake a profitable hunt that could have seen the susceptibly
entrained armour thoroughly routed. Perhaps, the IAF commanders were completely
overtaken by the imminence of the much-hyped Pakistani offensive that never
came about.
Inadequate Interdiction
Apparently
influenced by the Army’s notion that interdiction missions within the raging
battlefield were more lucrative from the point of view of immediacy of results,
the PAF paid much less heed to severing the supply lines beyond the frontline. A
known problem of interdiction within the battlefield that had to be contended
with, pertained to location of well-concealed stocks of ammunition and fuel,
during a single attacking pass. On the
other hand, an indirect approach of attacking nodal points like railway
stations and marshalling yards, over which replenishments of the consumed vital
stocks were bound to transit to various sectors, would have been a more profitable
option. While deferring to the Army, who did not seem to have the patience to
wait for the effects on the battlefield delayed by upto 72 hours or even more, the
PAF still undertook a belated and half-hearted interdiction campaign that
should have started in earnest from Day-1.
Of a total of 24 sorties (including 5 night
sorties by B-57 and C-130) flown against
deeper railway stations or rail segments, most were reported to have produced
satisfactory results. The targeted railway stations that were of consequence to
the critical Shakargarh Sector included Gurdaspur and Mukerian, while those
serving the equally stressed Chor Sector included Vasarwah and Monabao.
One of the very successful
missions of the war was an attack by Mirages on Mukerian Railway Station. On 15
December, Wg Cdr Hakimullah was tasked to lead a four-ship mission to attack Bhangala Railway
Station on Jalandhar-Pathankot railway line.
After pulling up for the attack, he was dismayed to discover that there
was no rolling stock in sight, but he decided to try his luck further south
along the railway line. Having flown a mere 30 seconds, he overflew
Mukerian Railway Station which was bustling with trains. Peeling off into the attack pattern, the four
Mirages set themselves up for single-pass dive attacks with two 750 lb bombs
each. According to Hakimullah’s estimate, there were at least 100 freight
bogies latched to different trains berthed adjacent to each other. The Mirages
released their bombs one by one though No 4, who had hung ordnance, pulled off
dry. The impact of bombs on the fuel and
ammunition laden trains was so furious that the blasts shook the aircraft; No
2’s drop tanks sheared off with the shock wave, but he was able to fly back
without any further damage. It was ironic that of all the interdiction missions,
this was the only one flown by the ideally-suited Mirages.
_______________________
_______________________
[1] ‘Foxtrot Sector’ was a large four-brigade sized
division.
[2] Indian Official
History of 1971 Indo-Pak War, Chapter IX, ‘The Punjab and Rajasthan Front,’
page 386.
[3] Indian counter-attacks were launched on the nights of 3/4 Dec,
4/5 Dec, 5/6 Dec, 8/9 Dec and 13/14 Dec.
[4] Indian Official
History of 1971 Indo-Pak War, Chapter IX, ‘The Punjab and Rajasthan Front,’
page 387.
[5] Brig Surjit Singh Chaudhry was replaced by Brig G S
Reen who was, in turn, replaced by Brig Piara Singh.
Salam.......Its nice to see that you regularly add articles to your blog. While I have not read all of your recent 2010 articles, it would be nice to go ABOVE the individual theatres and go to strategic level. From battle to war. How can one win the battle but lose the war?.......like in PAF history book, they give counts of kills........our kills are more than IAF kills.....is it important from Strategic point of view?
ReplyDeleteAt the strategic level, we only look for OBJECTIVES...It would be nice if you sum up your 1971 series with TWO things, one strategic vision of PAF and second an interview with either DILAWAR HUSSAIN or INAM UL HAQ KHAN of 14 Sqn from Dacca. You can ask them how much of the runway was put out of use because RAF C-130s landed there after the said "destruction of runway". Its clear that C-130 needs less runway than F-86 but its important to know that why we could not manage a thousand feet through PSP or any other mean? Was the real reason the notion that we can't continue any longer? If so, what was/is the pre-conception of strength level for continuing a war?
My unit, 76 Field Regiment was supporting the 105 Brigade' action on Sabuna Drain, The Brigade Major was One Major Waheed Kakkar (later to become COAS). He remembers the unit very fondly. This was the sector where Major Shabbir Sharif won the coveted award of Nishan e Haider, for his resilient Defence of Sabuna Drain. According to the unit history, the attack was so sudden that Indians had no chance to retaliate....(our Observer,than Capt Dawood was awarded TJ for this action), in fact the advancing troops charged the anti tank obstacles on the bridge, thinking them to be bivouacs of Indian soldiers!!! How ever the main action took place when the Indians tried their best to evict 6 FF from their position but failed to do so...
ReplyDeleteI have commanded 76 Field Regiment which was given Battle Honours for this action and we proudly call our selves "Sabunites".
Col (R) Arshad Rahat Ansari